There exists a need to formally assess the training benefits of Distributed Mission Operations (DMO) training on the performance of F-16 pilots. DMO training consists of multiplayer networked environments designed to enhance warfighter competency. Although many studies have converged on the effectiveness of training pilots in stand alone systems, very little research has been done on the effectiveness of DMO training of multiple pilots in networked simulators. As Bell and Waag (1998) outlined, to establish support for the effectiveness of training, several different levels of converging support are needed. A proper approach would involve collecting data from several sources that taken together will lend support to the significance of DMO training. To establish the effectiveness of networked simulated training, evidence from a variety of sources will be examined, including: (1) objective indicators of the performance of the pilots acting as a four-ship team engaged in point-defense actions, (2) ratings of team performance made by subject matter experts (SME), (3) scaling evidence collected using the Pathfinder paired-comparison methodology, and (4) pilot reactions to DMO as recorded on rating forms collected. Although all four types of data should show support for the effectiveness of DMO training, the inclusion of objective data allows stronger conclusions to be drawn. Objective data enables quantification of the subjective opinions and ratings, thereby providing indications of the return on investment (ROI), in terms of increased human performance, of the training system. Our current work involves assessing pilots using these methods, and the results should address the changes in capability of training our warfighters.