The acquisition of flight simulators for the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) has generally been guided by requirement precedents set overseas to suit other nation's operational circumstances. A training task analysis methodology has recently been developed by Australian Defence Force Materiel Division staff to provide a means for determining unique RAAF requirements. This paper will discuss the analysis methodology, how it differs from other established approaches, the results of its trial implementation, and some transfer of learning considerations.

The analysis methodology was applied in early 1997 to a new Operational Flight Trainer for the RAAF's upgraded AP-3C Maritime Patrol fleet. The trial methodology firstly compares training tasks and candidate training platforms in terms of Aircraft System stimuli, Environmental stimuli and Instructional parameters. Activities listed in associated syllabuses of training were not considered adequate for the purpose of identifying training tasks since a single ‘task' may be spread over several activities. Consequently, a hierarchical scheme of training tasks was identified through both a review of training documents and interviews with experienced instructional staff. The training task hierarchy comprised three levels: major skill Processes (e.g. Instrument Flying), temporal or logical Segments within processes (e.g. Approach), and specific crew tasks. A comprehensive set of over 400 training tasks were developed encompassing initial and categorisation training for Pilots and Flight Engineers. Existing training platforms were assessed on their merits, while potential platforms were assessed on the basis of defined functional requirements. Training tasks and training platforms were then compared and both full and partial matches in capability and requirements noted. Resource utilisation was then examined to account for cost-benefit considerations.

Application of a transfer of learning model to the analysis methodology may increase its utility in the identification of opportunities for part-task and part-crew training. This possible extension of the methodology will be discussed.