A research plan was developed to evaluate the cost and training effectiveness of the F-16 SAMTs. Historically, such evaluations have been conducted by comparing the effectiveness of the simulator against that of an actual equipment trainer (AET). However, readily comparative training devices and approaches do not exist in the case of the F-16. To evaluate the training effectiveness of the SAMTs, a criterion referenced approach was selected. Students will be assessed on their ability to perform maintenance tasks, taught using the SAMTs, on actual F-16 aircraft. End-of-course measures and follow-up retention testing will be conducted. Engine, pneudraulic, electrical, and flight control system tasks will be evaluated. Task selection criteria include difficulty, criticality, and frequency of performance. Specific training capabilities of the SAMTs to be assessed include two instructional features: the malfunction insertion capability and automatic student monitoring. A comparison will be made between the performance of students trained with the malfunction insertion feature operational versus without this instructional capability. The use of the student monitoring capability will be assessed through interviews with the course instructors. A comparative approach was adopted for assessing the cost effectiveness of the SAMTs. The cost of the hypothetical AET delivery system with the same set of learning objectives as the courses the SAMTs are utilized in will be computed and compared to the SAMT delivery system. Major categories in the cost model include facilities, instructional equipment, instructional materials, personnel, and supplies.