At the direction of Air Staff and Systems Command, Armstrong Laboratory conducted a study of operational squadron level flying training. Budget reductions in the formal training unit have focused interest in training at the squadron level. The objective of the laboratory study was to identify training requirements and shortfalls in the operational squadron and to determine areas where technology development could offer potential solutions.

The approach followed a training needs assessment model in obtaining information from training managers and operational squadron pilots. F-16 squadrons located in the Pacific Air Forces were chosen for study as the most likely population for generalizability of findings. About 2/3 of all pilots assigned to PACAF F-16 units participated in the data collection. Content areas investigated included flying, ancillary training, and professional military education, but the emphasis of the study was on flying training programs.

Survey findings appear valuable as preliminary indicators for improved training technology applications. Major findings were as follows: (1) Maintaining air combat proficiency is the most difficult single aspect of sustaining mission readiness in these squadrons. (2) Multi-force, dissimilar aircraft air combat training was the primary area where more and better training is needed. (3) Specialized training in certain skill areas including weapons systems/delivery and electronic combat is needed. Specifically focused technology development could improve training in all of the above areas, with a view toward improving the integration of combat skills in the cockpit through advanced simulation capabilities. Technology emphasis at the squadron level would significantly offset effects anticipated from cuts in schoolhouse programs. Other findings are also presented.

Menu

Thomas Gray